SUPERINJUNCTIONS! Don't like this?Sue me!

Everyone including Mongolia & Vanuatu can read about which 'celebrity' (ie self important egoist) has gone running to the courts to try to hide a tedious part of their life that the media has uncovered.

Unless you are in England where celebrities have the power to censor the internet via the courts, yet you can read terrorist manuals & terrorist recruitment sites! -NB years ago I read the Al Qaeda terrorist manual; it consists of school level chemistry, a Hollywood movie from 70 years ago & the accusation that  "Muslim women are having their heads shaved"(!)    I have committed a criminal offence by reading the manual, contravening Terrorism Act 2006.  So if you had a chemistry book at school or have seen an Edward G Robinson movie you have broken the law under the Terrorism Act.

I couldn't care less what Elton John or his husband David Furnish choose to do.  I am offended that Elton John's early very good albums were followed by bland pop albums.

The High & Supreme Courts have the purpose of judging the most serious matters. Instead a number of celebrities, with enough money, exploit the system, because they think that when they cheat on their partner the public will be interested. In fact the many adulterous relationships that occur are either ignored or momentarily in the news and then forgotten.  Ozzy Osbourne's infidelity ( Sabbath mad fan  here) is only remaining in the news because Sharon 'lies about her non existent role early in Ozzy's career & has prevented Bill Ward from rejoining Sabbath' Osbourne.is using it as part of the upsurge in her TV appearances.

In addition to Elton John wasting Supreme Court time, he has given an egregious interview to the Daily Mail describing  his 'perfect marriage' which only serves to draw attention to his attempt to hide the non cause celebre .that he has turned a tiny molehill into a mountain.  

Elton John has used the courts before to try to hide parts of his personal life. Everyone is entitled to a private life but for those who are famous enough to be reported on, they gladly pose & give interviews when it suits them, and so by trying to coverup a trivial matter, they merely conflagrate a momentary interest into a prolonged issue and a matter of freedom of the Press and legal ethics.